A “New Asianism”: Japanese Foreign Policy under the Democratic Party

In his 2011 paper (the link is to a preview), Daniel Sneider of Stanford University and The National Bureau of Asian Research argues that the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) came to power in 2009 aiming to put a greater emphasis on Asia in Japanese foreign policy. But “the DPJ has moved painfully along the learning curve from opposition politics to the realities of governance” and “on both sides of the Pacific, policymakers now believe the rocky transition has led to a restoration of the postwar consensus, particularly regarding the US-Japan security relationship.” Sneider, however, warns that “it would be wrong to conclude that DPJ policies, shaped during the party’s formative years by key leaders who remain largely in place, have been simply thrown aside.” He concludes: “The new Asianism, which should not be understood as a ‘pro-China’ shift but rather as an effort to manage the rise of China, remains a core identity of the DPJ.”

According to Sneider, policy implications include:

  • There is a real danger that relations between Japan and the U.S. could slide again into a morass. Avoiding that outcome requires a more serious effort to understand the underlying foreign policy identity of the DPJ and dispel illusions about the nature of change in Japan.
  • Rather than seeing the new Asianism as only a threat, policymakers should view it as an opportunity to jointly, and in concert with South Korea, reshape the security order in Northeast Asia.
  • The DPJ’s interest in an East Asian community potentially challenges China for leadership of future regional structures. The party’s focus on Asia, including ties with countries such as India, Vietnam, South Korea, and Australia, could create a security structure in Asia that can cope with the rise of China’s power.
  • The mechanism and basis for dialogue is weaker than ever in the U.S.-Japan alliance. The relationships built up over decades of rule by the Liberal Democratic Party need to be revitalized to adapt to a new era in Japanese politics.

2 thoughts on “A “New Asianism”: Japanese Foreign Policy under the Democratic Party

  1. Juan Manuel López Nadal

    Unfortunately the full text of the article cannot be downloaded through the link Only a preview is available.

  2. Lily Yao

    At the end of the preview, it mentioned the rape incident happened in Okinawa in 1995. As it ended in the middle, I would like to give some more information about what had happened next. Indeed, the discontent among the people of Okinawa in regards to the US military presence has been rising for years, mainly due to land disputes, pollution and crimes committed by a few US troops. In 2010, Prime Minister Hatoyama (DPJ) tried to relocate the US air base to other less populated area in Okinawa, but it was not being accepted by the US. In April 2012, the US has finally reached a deal with Japan to relocate 9,000 marines off Okinawa to Guam and other Asia-Pacific sites, while 10,000 Marines remain in Okinawa. In return for relocating the troops out of the country, Japan would have to pay $3.1b to the US. Yet, the timetable for the redeployment has not been made.

    But recent incident, in which another two American sailors have been arrested on suspicion of raping a woman in Okinawa, would, for sure, trigger another protest from the local community. Would this speed up the relocation? Or would the Japanese government try to keep the US troops in Okinawa due to the recent island disputes with China? No matter what, this is, no doubt, the worst possible timing.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s